[V4RB2] Time trials vs. MySQL

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 4/8/05 10:27 AM, "Olivier" <vidal_olivier at yahoo.fr> wrote:

Hi guys,

Let me repeat once one idea:

        version 2 is designed to be FASTER of 1.x
        
If we have some bottlenecks now, we will resolve them. POINT.

We are going just after we ship 2.0.2 or 2.0.3 and close major show stopper
bugs/issues for Valentina developers to build own benchmarks. And for big
dbs also, up to 4GB -- size of DVD


> OK but in that case, there is a problem. All the marketing of Valentina
> is at present built on its extreme speed.
> Its reputation and the advertisements (in RB developer for example)
> speak a great deal of its very important speed.
> Many developers chose and choose Valentina because they needed a really
> very fast database.
> it risks to have a lot of disappointment on the performances there are
> sharply less good than with Valentina 1.
> I hope that the team of Ruslan will manage to optimize Valentina 2 to
> approach performances of Valentina 1.
> 
> In my case, I chose to use API of Valentina rather than SQL so that my
> application is the fastest possible.
> But it is sometimes necessary to use SQL. So for all the network
> applications and all the applications already developed with Valentina
> 1.
> I think that for all the developers which are not Japanese, the use of
> the UTF8 will already improve the performances (many? I do not know).
> 
> In the magazine RB developer number 3.3 (in January February, 2005),
> page 32, Paul Lefebvre made benchmarks on SQLitePro (and the database
> interns of RB 5.5), it would be interesting to see already (before
> optimizations) which are the performances of Valentina 2.
> Anybody knows Paul Lefebvre ?
> We could ask him to make the same tests with Valentina 2 or to ask him
> for its database of test.

-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]