Base Object Method Prevents Adding Records
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sat Oct 23 20:13:20 CDT 2004
On 10/23/04 7:58 PM, "Thomas" <totoole at rocko.lab.csuchico.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The following Base Object Method is causing trouble in VAPP.
>>>
>>> if(ptr_parent_rcd = ptr_child_rcd,'False',if(ptr_parent_rcd
>>> ptr_child_rcd,concat(ptr_parent_rcd,'-
>>> ',ptr_child_rcd),concat(ptr_child_rcd,'-',ptr_parent_rcd)))
>>>
>>> It applies to a table with the following fields:
>>> ptr_parent_rcd (an ObjectPtr to one side of a many to many
>>> join)
>>> ptr_child_rcd (an ObjectPtr to the other side of the many to
>>> many join)
>>>
>>> This is a recursive many to many so the target of both ObjectPtrs is
>>> the same, but they point to different RecIDs in the target table.
>>
>> The first point.
>>
>> I see that you compare values of ObjectPtrs,
>> I.e. Values of RecID they point to.
>>
>> This is mistake.
>>
>> Because if you will delete a record, then its RecID is reused.
>
> The "On delete" property for both the parent and child ObjectPtrs in
> the lookup table is set to "Cascade". So the ObjectPtrs are deleted
> when the RecIDs they point to are deleted, no? Does this not prevent
> re-use mistakes? Is there a better way to manage these comparisons?
But you compare RecIds !
Why ?
Explain your idea please
You think that PARENT always have less RecID then child ?
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Valentina
mailing list