Valentina 2.0.  --  What is your 3 DREAM features? // TIMESTAMP 
    Ruslan Zasukhin 
    sunshine at public.kherson.ua
       
    Sat Jan 31 20:47:48 CST 2004
    
    
  
on 1/31/04 7:39 PM, Robert Brenstein at rjb at rz.uni-potsdam.de wrote:
>>> -- option to have automatic time stamping of all or specific fields
>>>  in a baseobject (updated only when content changes)
>> 
>> Yes, we have add DB.Clocks(), and TIMESTAMP field.
> 
> Is the TIMESTAMP an internal field (handled automatically by kernel)
> or it is a field for us to use explicitely? Ideally, a field would
> have a property "timestamp" settable through Field_SetFlag() and then
> we have a call Field_GetTimestamp() to find the current value. It
> should also be properly handled through SQL, so we can easily find
> records with fields that were modified after specific timestamp.
This is new field type.
Actually it is ULLONG.
It looks we have not yet polish this field type.
-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
More information about the Valentina
mailing list