UpdateAllRecords Not Working Properly?

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 4/22/04 12:51 PM, "Robert Brenstein" <rjb at rz.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:

>> On 4/22/04 9:48 AM, "Cindy Brown" <cindy at kowhaiprogramming.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>  So all I need to do is change 1 record and then hit "updateallrecords" and
>>>>  they'll all get the change? For example, if I get a cursor against 10
>>>>  records and then set one field of the first record to a value, can I then
>>>>  say "updateallrecords" and the other 9 will get the change?
>>> 
>>>  As far as I know, yes, that's what will happen.
>> 
>> Yes, Ken.
>> 
>> With a little correction.
>> 
>> You modify NOT first record.
>> 
>> You modify just VALUES in RAM buffer.
>> 
>> And when you do UpdateAll() all 10 records get that new value
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
> 
> And the values of fields that were not changed in the buffer remain
> as they were for each record (and not copied from the currently
> loaded record).

yes

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------