UpdateAllRecords Not Working Properly?

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 4/22/04 9:48 AM, "Cindy Brown" <cindy at kowhaiprogramming.com> wrote:

>> So all I need to do is change 1 record and then hit "updateallrecords" and
>> they'll all get the change? For example, if I get a cursor against 10
>> records and then set one field of the first record to a value, can I then
>> say "updateallrecords" and the other 9 will get the change?
> 
> As far as I know, yes, that's what will happen.

Yes, Ken.

With a little correction.

You modify NOT first record.

You modify just VALUES in RAM buffer.

And when you do UpdateAll() all 10 records get that new value


-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------