[ALL] let's think about Query Language for 2.0

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 5/23/03 1:52 PM, Andreas Grosam at agrosam at computerworks.ch wrote:

> IMO, this all together is a challenging task. I guess, this requires
> also a complete object DB - which may have fundamental differences with
> respect to the implementation compared to a relational DB.
> 
> My suggestion:
> A complete object-oriented API would be beyond a simple "query micro
> kernel". An object should be treated as a simple byte stream. Implement
> OO in a specific language, like OQL, ODMG.

Andreas,

I do not like OQL,

I do not like pure OO DBMS -- they have kill idea!  :-)
So now I prefer name Valentina as Object-Relational.

I do not like their way.
I want go by other way for OO database features.


I hope that 2.0 will introduce many good API, so everybody who want will be
able develop e.g. OQL level for Valentina. May be even Paradigma will do
this. But I do not like OQL :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------