[V4RB] design of future pluign

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

on 5/22/03 12:36 AM, Keith DeLong at delong at redcort.com wrote:

>>>> Valentina work for local db as true embedded engine...but I like this
>>>> idea...Or you think that it is normal if you will distribute 2 versions of
>>>> your apps ?
>>> 
>>> I have a client-server app in development that has a fairly complex set of
>>> local user options that I want to store locally in a Valentina DB for each
>>> client. For this it seems I need both the standalone engine and client
>>> engines built in.
>> 
>> I will ask again.
> 
> Sorry - I missed that question :-)
> 
>> Do you know at least one other database which can do this?
> 
> No I don't.
> 
> If it's not doable or reasonable -- okay. But it has great potential for
> distributed processing. Some of us refuse to treat the client as merely a
> terminal ;-)

It is reasonable. So let's work :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------