Win32 Performance
    Ruslan Zasukhin 
    sunshine at public.kherson.ua
       
    Fri Mar 21 21:44:52 CST 2003
    
    
  
on 3/21/03 8:26 PM, Brendan Murphy at bmurf at comcast.net wrote:
>> Hi Brendan,
>> 
>> Interesting results.
>> 
>> I see only few explanations of this:
>> 
>> 1) this is TRUE
>> 
>> 2) V4RB WIN is compiled by CodeWarrior.
>>    Users of Valentina for Director (made by Visual C++) say they do
>> not have
>> such problems....So if this point is true, then sounds like codeWarrior
>> generate code 8 times slower of Visual.
>>    I hardly believe in this, because CodeWarrior, as I recall, claim
>> that it
>> generate code better of Visual.
>> 
>> 3) ??? Right now I do not have more ideas...
>>     I will need future do some tests and profiling to see what is
>> wrong and
>> where...
> 
> 
> One place to start investigating is why calling flush leads
> to such extraordinary execution times of over a thousand
> seconds in my first test.
This is not a secret.
Flush is slow operation.
Well, in fact may be your PC simply have slower HDD?
> It may lead you to the root cause
> of the performance difference since the flush call seems to
> magnify the problem.
-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com
To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://listserv.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
More information about the Valentina
mailing list