Oh no, not Unicode again

[erne]

Hi Ruslan,

MHO

on 1-03-2003 15:30, Ruslan Zasukhin at sunshine at public.kherson.ua wrote:

>> Can you consider adding UTF support to 1.x? For me, at least, this
>> feature would be well worth a hefty upgrade price!  Based on previous
>> threads, I'm sure I'm not alone on this. Please, please reconsider my
>> (our) request to add Unicode support to Valentina 1.x.
> 
> In the same time, I invite all Valentina developers also take part in
> discussion of this questions once again.
> 
> QUESTIONS: 
> 
> -- Classic still important ?

yep!

> or Carbon is enough ?

nope!

> classic can do Unicode work ?
> 

I hope yes

> 
> -- show we have the same and only
> String and VarChar fields
> 
> with addition of 'encoding' parameter?
> although this way looks to be hard for UTF16
> 
> 
> -- or we should get new 2 fields
> 
> UString
> UVarChar
> 
> how other dbs do this ?
> 
> Just want to hear what you know about this?
> 

no clues, sorry


Cool Runnings,
Erne.

-- 
|  e r  |  Ernesto Giannotta
|  n e  |  Musical Box - a media store