NoLocks // 1.9.8b10 adoption of record locks. Feedback

[erne]

Hi Ruslan,

On Lunedì, lug 7, 2003, at 16:26 Europe/Rome, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:

>> So we don't have a transaction system yet, but just a cursor lock 
>> system
>>
>> when we'll have transactions doesn't the isolation level set the rules
>> over the cursor building lock mode (or we'll have both and the 
>> stricter
>> will overrid the weaker)?
>
> With SQL92, we will be able control this locks via SQL itself.
> So we will be able do
>
>     db.SqlSelect( "SELECT .... Isolation level Read committed" )
>
> And skip that 3 parameters.
>

will we get a Transaction object for V4RB?

some like:
txn = new vTransaction(myDB)
txn.IsolationLevel = kReadCommitted
txn.Begin
txn.SqlThis
txn.SqlThat
txn.Committ


Cool Runnings,
Erne.

|er| musical box
|ne| a media store