1.9.8b10 adoption of record locks. Feedback

[Charles Yeomans]

On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 02:52 PM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:

> on 7/4/03 17:47, Charles Yeomans at yeomans at desuetude.com wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> Then I will fix it right now...one moment...Hmm,
>>> I see that this function do NOT clears gVRB_Error.
>>>
>>> Charles, I think I need from you small project.
>>> Or may be you mean other function? Please check.
>>
>>
>> Actually, it appears that this problem is gone, but in the course of
>> writing a test project I see that VBaseObject.Field("recID") returns
>> nil, as do VBaseObject.Field("recID") and VBaseObject.Field("recid").
>>
>> I'd like to suggest that you add a function VBaseObject.RecID() as
>> VULong that returns the recID field, since it's intrinsic to
>> VBaseObject.
>
> But if you want to obtain value of recid for current record,
> Then VBaseObject have method or property
>
>     GetRecID() as Long
>
> Or in V4RB this is probably property
> Check docs please.
>
This is not what I want.  I want to obtain a reference to the VField 
object Field("recID").

It is of course possible to add a function RecID() as VULong in V4Rb 
using the new class extension mechanism in Rb5, and this I have done.

Charles Yeomans