Next beta will have record locks.

[Charles Yeomans]

On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 01:00 PM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:

> on 7/1/03 19:20, erne at ernestogiannotta at tiscalinet.it wrote:
>
>> what's the need of a READ ONLY lock?
>
> If one cursor do READ lock,
> Then other cursor cannot set WRITE lock,
> But still can set READ lock, this is why it is named also SHARED

So if cursor2 sets a READ lock, then cursor1 cannot set a WRITE lock, 
even though it has a READ lock?  But once, say cursor1 releases its 
READ lock, then cursor2 can get a WRITE lock?

Charles Yeomans