[for ALL] Valentina Server 1.x // And they say OpenBase is good?

[Keith DeLong]

Ruslan,
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE!

I'm dieing for multi-user support. OS X support is killing me because (as we
have discussed) X will open an already open db with no error thrown.

One of the things I've worried about is that we'd both have to do a lot of
testing of all the new stuff in 2.0 before I'd get a releasable server
product. This appears to me it would be several months after first 2.0 beta.

While I'm anxious for the new features of 2.0, what I MOST NEED RIGHT NOW is
multi-user support. A 1.x server product would be a very huge thing as all
we'd have to do is ensure the communications are robust and functioning...

Did I say PLEASE?

Thanks for giving me great encouragement and a ray of hope Ruslan,

Keith DeLong

> 5) And to warm up you :-)
> 
> We here already have Valentina Server working on Windows for now.
> As backend Igor use 1.x kernel (!)
> In other words we already have done:
>   -- threading model
>   -- sockets,
>   -- network protocol
> 
> We can send all SQL commands of Valentina 1.x
> And read/write data...
> 
> We have here crazy idea...May be we may ship Valentina Server 1.x ?
> It will be based on current kernel.
> No transactions. No new SQL parser... No Users/Group.
> But this will be multi-user, true Client-Server access to Valentina
> database!
> 
> What you think?  Should we do this?