AW: AW: AW: Combining cursors

[Florian Bogeschdorfer]

I don't think that is the same while you may go both ways to get the result.
But I would like that very much too. In spite of searching the whole DB just
search a cursor, kind of focussing in. Very nice Ruslan!

Florian 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: valentina-bounces at lists.macserve.net 
> [mailto:valentina-bounces at lists.macserve.net] Im Auftrag von Barney
> Gesendet: Montag, 1. Dezember 2003 19:36
> An: valentina
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Combining cursors
> 
> 
> I might be referring to the same thing here ?
> 
> But, something I have regularly found myself wanting to do is 
> to be able to search a cursor using SQL with the result being 
> a second cursor.
> 
> This would be really handy very often !
> 
> Barney
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> on 12/2/03 2:08 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin at 
> sunshine at public.kherson.ua wrote:
> 
> > on 12/1/03 2:08 PM, Florian Bogeschdorfer at fb at memedia.de wrote:
> > 
> >>> Your talk about
> >>> 
> >>>     curs = curs1.Union( curs2 )
> >>>     curs = curs1.Intersect( curs2 )
> >>>     curs = curs1.Except( curs2 )
> >>> 
> >>> I wonder, if you really will need on cursor level, If 
> this will be 
> >>> implemented in SQL ?
> >> 
> >> 1. More speed I guess
> >> 
> >> 2. more comfortable (at least for me)
> >> 
> >> 3. Easier, much easier, for those who newbies to SQL
> >> 
> >> 4. You can combine cursors where you kept no log about the queries
> >> 
> >> 5. Having a large cursor where you want to except a small cursor, 
> >> that is frequently updated - again: speed?
> > 
> > Agree!
> > 
> >> 6. I would like it very much...maybe others too
> > 
> > Okay, we will add this API into 2.0
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Valentina mailing list
> Valentina at lists.macserve.net
> http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina