<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>YMVSF - Yet more Valentina Studio Feedback</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><BR>
Double clicking on a table in the Database Elements column of the Schema Browser should open a Data Browser window on the selected table name.<BR>
<BR>
===<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><FONT FACE="Monaco, Courier New"><BR>
On 12/20/05 4:08 PM, "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine@public.kherson.ua> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> On 12/21/05 12:02 AM, "Ed Kleban" <Ed@Kleban.com> wrote:<BR>
> <BR>
>> Is there really merit to having data browser row numbers displayed in a first<BR>
>> column that happen to NOT be RecID values? Does this offer any benefit?<BR>
>> Might it not offer some considerable confusion? It sure did for me.<BR>
> <BR>
> Hard to say. Can be also added as option into VIEW menu.<BR>
> <BR>
<BR>
No longer hard for me to say. PLEASE provide an option to suppress display of the line numbers. My default settings will be, and I believe might well be argued as reasonable defaults, to never display line numbers and to always display RecID numbers. Right now, I am continually confusing the line numbers for RecId numbers and getting lost and confused in my debugging. <BR>
<BR>
I realize that for the style of DB accesses that many others will employ, RecID numbers are totally irrelevant. But if you are using the API calls instead of SQL, this is far less likely to be the case.<BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Monaco, Courier New"><BR>
> At least this help to UNDERSTAND that RecID is not equal to Logical number<BR>
> of record :-)<BR>
> <BR>
<BR>
Maybe. Or maybe just confuse people more. For example the views shown in the data browser are now showing something completely different from the views in the diagrams you include in the Kernel reference. If RecIds were displayed instead the two would be showing the same thing.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN>
</BODY>
</HTML>