[V4MD] pointer at the same table by binary_link

[Charles Yeomans]

On Sep 16, 2005, at 12:29 PM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:

> On 9/16/05 4:24 PM, "Sims, John" <ayu8 at cdc.gov> wrote:
>
>> Ruslan,
>>
>> I believe we had this dicussion before.  I believe you must consider 
>> the
>> intention in these situations.  When linking 2 records, the intention 
>> is
>> to have the 2 records linked together.  If they are already linked
>> together, then your intention is already met and Valentina should just
>> continue on.  If you unlink 2 records, the intention is to not have 
>> the
>> 2 records linked together.  If the 2 records were never linked in the
>> first place, then your intention is already met and Valentina should
>> just continue on.
>
> So you vote for NOT-throwing error here ?
>
> I not agree John.
>
> Look e.g. How works API of any OS when you try to open file which is 
> already
> opened. Or close already closed file. OS return you error.
>
> If you try marry already married people then you have some logical 
> mistake.
> Before you marry them government at first make sure that both are NOT
> married at all on this moment. Right ?

Depends on the country and religion.

--------------
Charles Yeomans