[V4REV] VTable_SortN syntax discussed.

[Robert Brenstein]

>  > What you wrote here is different than what Ivan wrote earlier. And
>>  from point of view of Rev, the last two function calls are different:
>>  the first has min 3 but unlimited number of params (well, limited by
>>  number of fields), the second has exactly 3 parameters.
>
>Absolutely correct, Robert!
>
>So what way is better for Revolution ?
>

Yes, I think that from the 3, actually 4, options presented, the last 
is the best because it has a fixed number of parameters and the sort 
string can be easily built on the fly as a variable and it will thus 
be operationally parallel to SQL calls.

Robert