[V4RB2] 2.0.4fc5 crash - more info
Ruslan Zasukhin
sunshine at public.kherson.ua
Sun Jun 12 00:31:37 CDT 2005
On 6/11/05 5:09 PM, "Kem Tekinay" <ktekinay at mactechnologies.com> wrote:
> I turned off compression (and sorting) and let my program run overnight. I
> ended up with 37,723 master records (e-mail) and 51,581 related records (the
> e-mail text). Searching for e-mail by it's text now takes about a second.
>
> In other words, without compression, my program was able to add almost twice
> as many records in the same time frame and searches take almost no time at
> all, not the 2-minutes I saw earlier.
>
> That it takes longer to add records is to be expected, and I don't mind. But
> the compression seems to be interfering with the searches.
>
> As a next step, I am going to turn compression back on but turn off sorting
> and add records again. I just want to make sure that the problem with
> searching was due to compression and not the sorting bug I reported
> yesterday.
Actually strange results. Something wrong.
Compression affect only TEXT field itself.
It not touch indexes.
Kem, do you have indexes on that TEXT fields?
May be you do NOT-indexed searches ?!
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
[I feel the need: the need for speed]
More information about the Valentina-beta
mailing list