local pointer and auto-completion

[Ruslan Zasukhin]

On 1/17/05 3:17 PM, "Olivier" <vidal_olivier at yahoo.fr> wrote:

> Hi Ruslan,
> 
> In certain examples, you indicate that it is preferable (because
> faster) to create a variable or a local property for the used table or
> the DB.
> 
> But in that case (VarTable1.field ("NameString") .value), we have no
> more the auto-completion of RB.
> While if we use directly "Wind1.table1. NameString.value", we have the
> auto-completion of RB. It is, sometimes,  thus simpler.
> To have a local pointer of the table is it really faster?

It is faster, but use it only for big loops.

-- 
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin      [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: ruslan at paradigmasoft.com
web: http://www.paradigmasoft.com

To subscribe to the Valentina mail list go to:
http://lists.macserve.net/mailman/listinfo/valentina
-------------------------------------------------------------