expiriences with RB2006r1b2?

[Ed Kleban]

My comment is based on what someone else told me about r1b1, when I
discovered that there was a problem for my code compiling under PEF on r1b1.
I have not yet tried PEF under r1b2.  I probably will much later today.
>From what messages I've seen on the RB beta list however, I'm guessing this
has not yet changed.

Ruslan, is it appropriate for you to to post my comment here, or for Cladius
to ask this question here, as opposed to in the REALbasic beta newsgroup?  I
sent you that statement directly in confidence since I knew that you
personally were on the RB Beta list.  Is it ok with REAL Software to be
posting that information here?



On 12/21/05 1:17 AM, "Ruslan Zasukhin" <sunshine at public.kherson.ua> wrote:

> On 12/21/05 7:38 AM, "Claudius Sailer" <Claudius at sailer-online.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Claudius,
> 
>> has someone tested RB2006r1b2 with V4RB2?
>> Does this work?
>> 
>> I can't compile my application. At the end of the compiling process I
>> get an error message (something with linking).
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=ptuwcnyj
>> 
>> And it would be nice when I could say that V4RB2 is not the reason.
> 
> Ed have point that latest beta of RB support only MACHO.
> Is this true guys ?
> 
> If this is true, then it looks we need in urgent way make V4RB macho.
> 
> 
> Ed, say that release will have PEF.
>